Boxed Style

আইফোন জিতে ক্লিক করুন

Wednesday 4 November 2015

HC stays case on Heidelberg Cement scam

 Star Business Report

The High Court yesterday stayed a case on the 1996 stockmarket scam, the verdict of which was scheduled to be delivered on November 8 by a special tribunal.
Justice Naima Haider and Justice Mustafa Zaman Islam passed the order after AS Shahudul Islam Bulbul, a defendant in the case, filed a writ petition.
The petition challenged a clause in the Securities and Exchange Commission Ordinance of 1969 that put the “burden of proof” on the defendants, said Mohsen Rashid, Bulbul's lawyer.
With the stay order, the proceedings of the case will remain suspended at the tribunal, he said.
Earlier on October 27, the special tribunal fixed November 8 to deliver the verdict on the case, which involves Rakibur Rahman, former president of the Dhaka Stock Exchange; AS Shahudul Islam Bulbul, a former director of the premier bourse; and Abu Tayeb, the then chairman of Chittagong Cement and Clinker and Grinding Company.
The three accused were directors of the cement company, now known as Heidelberg Cement, according to a probe report after the 1996 scam.
Although Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission directed them to step down from the posts, they continued to stay as directors in the company, whose prices crossed Tk 18,000 per share in 1996 against a book value of Tk 134.

One of the directors of the company transferred a large number of shares in the July-November period of 1996 to one of his relatives, which were then sold off in the market, the probe report said, without mentioning any name.
The BSEC had also inquired about the sales of shares by the company to outsiders (Indian and Iranian nationals) by bypassing the DSE and Chittagong Stock Exchange.
There was no satisfactory reply from the company, which is also a defendant of the case.
During the period, some shares were sold by foreign investors and there were some price-sensitive announcements, which made the prices peak, the committee found.
These clearly indicate an act of manipulation and the dealings come within mischief under a section of the Securities and Exchange Ordinance, the report said.