Monday, 9 November 2015

Death penalty for 2 killers of Rakib

Trial completed in 11 working days; victim's family demand capital punishment for Sharif's mother

Amanur Aman from Khulna, and Wasim Bin Habib
Two persons have been handed down the death penalty for killing 13-year-old Rakib by pumping air into his rectum in Khulna, an incident that sparked outrage all over the country three months ago.
The murder of the teenage boy was "heinous and barbaric", Khulna Metropolitan Magistrate's Court yesterday said in its verdict, sentencing the prime accused, Omar Sharif, and his accomplice and uncle Mintu Khan to death.
This type of incident must not happen again in the country, and that is why such a verdict has been given, Judge Dilruba Sultana said while announcing the judgment in a packed courtroom around 1:30pm.
The trial proceedings were completed in 11 working days, which is “unprecedented” in the country, said the prosecution.
The court, however, acquitted Sharif's mother Beauty Begum, as the charges against her could not be proved.
The victim's parents and relatives were unhappy with the acquittal of Beauty, and said they wanted all the three to walk the gallows.
They chanted slogans outside the courtroom, demanding capital punishment for Beauty.

“We are happy that Sharif and Mintu were given the death penalty. But it is painful for me to see that the woman, who was present when the barbaric killing was carried out, has been acquitted,” said Rakib's father Nur Alam, who works in Satkhira.
The boy's mother, Lucky Begum, said she was shocked that Beauty was not handed down any punishment.
Terming her a "killer", Lucky said, "How could a mother tolerate her son torturing a minor boy mercilessly. She didn't even say anything, let alone stopping her son."
"She [Beauty] deserves to hang," said Lucky, who works as a domestic help.
After the verdict, advocate Mominul Islam, coordinator of Bangladesh Manabadhikar Bastabayan Sangstha's Khulna District Unit, told reporters that both sides have the option to file an appeal with the High Court if they wish.
Earlier, the accused were brought to the courtroom amid tight security around 10:00am.
The court sat around 1:00pm, and gave the judgment in the presence of Rakib's parents and relatives as well as many locals.
Rakib's nine-year-old sister Rima, who was at the court, was seen wiping tears from her eyes.
Relatives of Rakib at a Khulna court building after a verdict sentencing two to death for his killing. Photo: Star
On August 3, Sharif, owner of “Sharif Motors”, and his uncle Mintu Khan called Rakib, a former employee of Sharif, to his workshop in Tutpara Kabarkhana of Khulna when the boy went to a nearby store to buy some paint.
The duo stripped the boy, inserted a high-pressure air pump nozzle into his rectum and filled the body with air.
After Rakib became unconscious, Sharif and Mintu took him to a clinic and then to Khulna Medical College Hospital.
As the boy's condition deteriorated, his family decided to bring him to the capital for better treatment.
They started for Dhaka in an ambulance and stopped at Ad-din Hospital in Baikali, hoping to bring Rakib to the capital by a helicopter as they heard the hospital had the facility. But doctors there declared him dead around 10:30pm.
Rakib's intestines tore apart and lungs burst as air filled the abdomen. He died from multiple organ failure, police said, quoting doctors.
Locals caught Sharif, Mintu and Beauty, and handed them over to the police later that night.
Rakib, a school dropout, worked at Sharif's garage for Tk 50 a day for around two years to support his family. His “fault” was that he left the job at the workshop and joined elsewhere.
Rakib's family said he left the garage about five months ago, as Sharif and Mintu would often beat him. He then started working at another garage, which annoyed Sharif.
The boy's brutal murder triggered a barrage of condemnation and protest on the social media.
On August 4, Rakib's father filed a murder case with Khulna Sadar Police Station against Sharif, Mintu and Beauty.
Investigating officer of the case Sub-Inspector Kazi Mostak Ahmed pressed charges against the three on September 25. They were indicted on October 5.

Amnesty Int'l views show political bias

 News Analysis

Amnesty International (AI) has caused fury and rage in the minds of Bangladeshis with its latest statement in support of two war criminals awaiting death – SQ Chowdhury and Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed.
The way it tried to defend these two criminals is surprising, given AI's long track record, which is not always stone-paved (its false claim of babies being killed by Saddam Hussein in Iraq is just a reminder). More shocking and surprising was the manner in which it tried to insult our war of independence by saying that “pro-independence forces also committed serious crimes”.
We understand AI's anti-death stance. But this time its statement is questionable and looks like a deliberate and motivated attempt to slur the war crimes trial process with false information.
Let's scrutinise the AI statement paragraph by paragraph.
In its second paragraph, the statement claimed that our International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) failed to meet international standards. It is a sweeping comment without elaboration which should be waved away with similar vagueness. But still we can elaborate.

Our ICT had been most fair to the defendants if we compare them to Nuremberg trial or Tokyo trial. The defendants had all the rights to appeal. The trials were open to all and the accused were given adequate time and facilities to prepare their cases. In the beginning, there were some concerns about the process which were later addressed. For example, the provision for review appeal was incorporated.
After these were done, the US Ambassador-at-large for War Crimes, Stephen Rapp, who closely observed the trial process, had concluded by saying “the best way in the world to find the truth is the judicial process where the evidence is presented, where witnesses are cross-examined, where both sides have an opportunity to be heard and that is what is being done here (Bangladesh). It is the process that the American government strongly supports.”
AI statement's third paragraph is also motivated and travesty of truth. The trial of these two criminals started in 2012. So, how could AI say make the comment that "in the government's haste to see more war crimes convicts executed…” Where does the AI see the haste? Rather we would say justice had been delayed, in this case long 44 years.
AI's comment on the trial of Mojaheed is also incorrect and reflects its serious misunderstanding and lack of knowledge about our war of independence. Bangladeshis all know what role Mojaheed and his killer force Al-Badr played during the war. Mojaheed, as the second-in-command of Al-Badr, must bear the responsibilities of all killings, raping and other atrocities committed by his force. It was clearly established before the court that Mojaheed himself called his force as the “angel of death” (reported in Dainik Sangram, Jamaat's party paper, on April 24, 1971). And he said: “Al-Badr is the Azrail (angel of death) to the Indian agents.”
During the trial, a witness said he saw Mojaheed in a torture cell where hundreds of freedom fighters were killed. He also heard the war criminal say to a Pakistani army officer about a few freedom fighters who should be shot dead.
But AI preferred not to go through these evidence before making its own conclusion.
In case of SQ Chowdhury's case, AI's allegation also does not hold water. AI said a witness testified that a person who could corroborate his statement was dead when in fact the individual was very much alive and had even submitted a signed affidavit to the court to prove it.
Here, AI simply bought what SQ Chowdhury's defence wanted all to believe. The facts are that the witness described a touching tale of how his family members were killed by Chowdhury and how he survived. He also said how he took shelter in another person's house and saved his own life.
When the defence asked him where the 'another person' named Danu Mia was, the witness said he had heard that Danu Mia had died.
About a year later, SQ Chowdhury's defence produced an affidavit by Danu Mia well after the time to do so expired. The defence had plenty of time to examine the investigation officer's report to marshal its defence and name Danu Mia. But it did not do so.
Whether Danu Mia was dead or alive does not undermine the atrocity that was committed that day, but AI's statement put such a twist that it might seem the merit of the incident depended on Danu Mia.
The most nefarious comment AI made is about our war. It suddenly commented that “serious crimes were also committed by the pro-independence forces, but no one has been investigated or brought to justice for them”.
We believe AI, in supporting the war criminals, had forgotten the history of war crimes trials. It needs to juggle up its memory on the Nuremberg trial or Tokyo trial.
On the European front, the bombing of Dresden was a debatable issue as British and American aircraft dropped 3,900 pounds of bombs on the cultural city. It was a non-military target. And yet the Nuremberg trial or any other trial did not deal with the Dresden issue.
Similarly, Tokyo trial did not deal with the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Any war trial is by the victors. And naturally atrocities of the defeated forces are tried in international tribunals. So when AI suddenly brought to the fore the question of 'crimes' by pro-liberation forces, it revealed the political nature and thereby the intention of the statement.
AI put a new spin to its statement when it held a press conference later to deny that it had not demanded release of SQ Chowdhury or Mojaheed nor had it wanted trial of pro-liberation forces. AI's this explanation is at best reviled on the street because whatever it said in support of Chowdhury and Mojaheed actually amounts to seeking their release. Otherwise why should it say that miscarriage of justice is to happen through their executions? Similarly why should it raise the issue of 'serious crimes' by pro-liberation forces unless it seeks justice for them?
In making a highly politically biased statement AI actually has undermined its position as an advocate of human rights and damaged its reputation.

Special Drive in Districts 1,500 held in 2 days

Star Report
More than 1,500 people including many activists of Jamaat-e-Islami and BNP have been arrested in a special drive in different districts in the last two days.
Among them, 665 were arrested in 24 hours as of yesterday evening during the drive that the police headquarters in Dhaka ordered two days ago to maintain law and order, according to sources in the HQ.
Taskforces comprising members of police, Armed Police Battalion, Rapid Action Battalion, Border Guard Bangladesh and Coast Guard started the drive on Friday night and launched a crackdown in 16 districts as of yesterday evening to arrest suspected troublemakers, the sources added.
The drive is set to continue until further notice, said an official at the police HQ wishing not to be named.
As many as 164 people were arrested yesterday in Mymensingh, 17 in Chittagong metropolitan areas, 45 in Pirojpur, 43 in Feni, 50 in Satkhira, 22 in Meherpur, 21 in Joypurhat, seven in Chapainawabganj, two each in Bogra and Sherpur and one in Moulvibazar.
Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal at a programme at the city's Institution of Engineers yesterday said the drive is not meant to arrest Jamaat and BNP men.
He said it is a measure that they undertake at times, on the basis of intelligence reports, to prevent those who have been trying to destabilise the country through bomb blasts and murders.
Mufti Mahmud Khan, director of Rab's legal and media wing, said they have already directed all battalions across the country to strengthen vigilance to maintain law and order and foil any plans of subversive activities.
The arrestees in in Mymensingh include Khandaker Masudul Alam, secretary of Jubo Dal district unit, as confirmed by Md Kamrul Islam, officer-in-charge of Kotwali police.
Masud is an accused in eight cases in connection with arms and explosives, arson and police assault, among others, the OC said.
The police said other arrestees are also accused in different cases filed with the respective police stations. They were produced before separate Mymensingh courts, which sent them to jail.
Around 300 members of a joint force conducted a special drive on different slum areas under Bakalia Police Station in Chittagong and arrested 17 people.
Additional Commissioner (crime and operation) Debdas Bhattacharia of CMP told The Daily Star that the special drive was started to arrest criminals in the country's present context and with a view to maintaining law and order.
In the last three days, around 50 people were arrested in Motijhorna, Agrabad and Halishahar areas, said the additional commissioner.
Among the 45 people arrested in Pirojpur, six are BNP men and eight Jamaat men, including Md Mofazzel Hossain, secretary of Nadmula union under Bhandaria upazila.
Md Motiar Rahman, organising secretary of Joypurhat district BNP, Lokman Hakim, Jamaat ameer, and Younus Ali, organising secretary of Mohammadabad union of Joypurhat Sadar, are among 21 BNP, Jamaat and Shibir men arrested in Joypurhat.
Jakiganj upazila vice-chairman and upazila Jamaat Secretary Gulam Rabbani Jabed was arrested yesterday during the drive.
Among the 50 people arrested in Satkhira, 37 belong to Jamaat-Shibir, while one is a BNP activist. The arrestees include Nayeb-e-Ameer of Kalaroa upazila unit Jamaat Abdul Matin Khan, Jamaat activist and No 6 Ward councillor of Satkhira municipality Shahidul Islam, and Jhaodanga union Jamaat president and Jamaat Rokan Anwarul Islam.
Those arrested in Feni include district Jamaat Assistant Secretary Mahmudul Hasan, Finance Secretary Shafiqul Islam and Assistant Finance Secretary Maksudur Rahman.
Rab Director General Benazir Ahmed has meanwhile said law-enforcement and intelligence agencies have been put on alert so that banned Islamist outfit Jama'atul Mujahidin Bangladesh (JMB) cannot regroup again in the northern districts.
Identified JMB men who are on bail are under intelligence watch, the DG said after holding a special law-enforcement meeting along with police, Rab, BGB and intelligence forces at the office of the superintendent of police in Pabna yesterday.
(Our district correspondents concerned have contributed to this report)

AD BANNAR