Tuesday, 3 November 2015

No sorry from United States for South China Sea trip

The US will send its military "wherever" international law allows, an admiral says. Last week, the United States sailed a warship close to artificial islands that China is building in the contested the South China Sea.
Südchinesisches Meer US Navy USS Lassen Zerstörer
On Tuesday, the head of the US Pacific military forces said the navy did not intend any threat to Chinawhen it sent a warship past the country's contested space in the Spratly Archipelago. Admiral Harry B. Harris Jr. spoke Tuesday to Stanford University students studying at Peking University during his first visit to the Chinese capital, Beijing, as commander of US Pacific Command.
"International seas and airspace belong to everyone and are not the dominion of any single nation," Harris said Tuesday, according to prepared remarks. "Our military will continue to fly, sail, and operate whenever and wherever international law allows. The South China Sea is not - and will not - be an exception."
Harris has frequently criticized China's land reclamation in the sea. In March, he said China would create "a great wall of sand" and cause serious concern about militarizing reefs and artificial islands in an area of competing territorial claims by several nations. On Tuesday, however, he seemed mostly upbeat in his assessment of prospects for improving relations with China.
"We've been conducting freedom of navigation operations all over the world for decades, so no one should be surprised by them," Harris said. "I truly believe that these routine operations should never be construed as a threat to any nation. The United States takes no position on competing sovereignty claims to land features in the South China Sea and we encourage all claimants to solve disputes peacefully, without coercion, and in accordance with international law."
mkg/ (Reuters, AFP, AP)

Opinion: An unpleasant victory for Brussels

The EU would have preferred a coalition government in Ankara. Now, Europe has to dance to Erdogan's tune if it wants his help in the refugee crisis, says DW's Barbara Wesel.
Brüssel Treffen mit türkischem Präsidenten Tayyip Erdogan
We wish Ankara a stable government - that is how the European Union put it officially before election day in Turkey. Most people did not expect the sweeping victory of the former and current Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Were opinion pollsters completely off the mark again? Or were the elections fudged? Was there not enough reason to doubt the democratic validity of these elections, like the rekindled war on Kurds, the unexplained bomb attacks in Ankara, the repression of the opposition and critical media?
The EU needs the "Sultan of the Bosphorus"
The irony of the story lies in the fact that the EU has neglected the conflict with the "Sultan of the Bosphorus" for years. There was no need to argue with him, as EU talks had been put on the backburner anyway. And thus, the ascent of an autocratic ruler at the threshold of the EU has continued and gone fairly unnoticed by Brussels because it has had more important problems to deal with. Now, the Europeans are in the unfortunate position of needing Erdogan more than he needs Europe. Without him, there will be no solution to the refugee crisis, which threatens to tear apart the European Union. The president, however, no longer feels any political pressure as his power has been sealed and domestically, the two million Syrians in Turkey are not a crucial issue for him. Evidently, his compatriots have a relaxed stance towards the refugees.
Barbara Wesel Studio Brüssel
Barbara Wesel, DW's correspondent in Brussels
Erdogan is thus in the convenient position of being able to hike the cost of the smallest political favor as high as he feels necessary. Insider circles in Brussels predict a prolonged phase of bazaar diplomacy with Turkey and many believe that the Turkish president has more leverage than the EU. Like Angela Merkel, leading European politicians will make a pilgrimage to Erdogan and offer him a bow of the head. What an outright unpleasant thought! The EU is now at the mercy of Erdogan, says a long-serving European parliamentarian. This is, unfortunately, true and the president will savor every moment of it.
How far can practical politics go?
In view of this situation, Europeans will no longer ask whether they must sell out their principles to ensure Turkey's cooperation, but instead, how far they are willing to go. If the eastern European states had a scrap of sense, then they would have to recognize the fact that an internal EU compromise would be better than making its future dependent on the autocrat in Ankara.
But people cannot suddenly be reasonable overnight, so Europeans will be confronted with tough and embarrassing negotiations. They will repeatedly have to ask themselves how much their democratic ideals are actually worth. Europe is in the process of selling out in installments. The EU has already missed the chance to put its foot down when dealing with the little dictator in Hungary. And now that Erdogan is on his way to becoming the great dictator of Turkey, the EU will have very few arguments and no means of exerting political pressure to demand democracy.
Negotiations will be unpleasant
Upcoming negotiations on refugees will be unpleasant when it comes to the Turkish president's demands in exchange for preventing refugees from traveling to Europe and acting as a border guard for the EU. The only collateral the Europeans possess is Turkey's desire for visa liberalization - it is of economic importance to Erdogan. In general, only the subject of economic cooperation may perhaps open doors to concessions in the refugee issue.
When the haggling starts, there is one line Europeans should not cross: the treatment of Kurds. If Erdogan does not soften his tough stance on the Kurds, then the EU must pull the ripcord and solve the refugee crisis without him. Europe now sees the affirmation of a purported Chinese curse: It is better to be a dog in a peaceful time than humane in a chaotic period.

Report: Tax authorities launch raids on German football association

The German tax authorities have launched raids on the headquarters of the DFB (German FA) as well as private residences. This comes amid allegations that illicit funds were used to land the 2006 World Cup.
The story was first reported by the mass-circulation newspaper "Bild" as Germans were arriving for work on Tuesday. This has since been confirmed by the public prosecutor's office in Frankfurt.
Early on Tuesday, the tax authorities began searching not only the premises of the DFB's (German FA) Frankfurt headquarters, but also the residences of some of the key figures in a scandal over an alleged payment to FIFA in connection with Germany's successful bid to host the 2006 World Cup.
According to "Bild" the residences of DFB President Wolfgang Niersbach and his predecessor, Theo Zwanziger, were among those being searched.
"We are searching for incriminating material that backs up tax evasion suspicions," one of the investigators said.
Prosecutors said more than 50 investigators took part in the raids, seizing files, computers and hard discs.
6.7-million-euro payment
Specifically, the raids relate to an alleged payment of 6.7 million euros ($7.4 million) made to the late former Addidas CEO, Robert Louis-Dreyfus in 2005. All involved in the affair seem to agree that this payment was to reimburse Louis -Dreyfus for a loan made to the committee that first bid for, then organized the 2006 World Cup in Germany.
Where the parties disagree is on when Louis-Dreyfus made the original loan of 10 million Swiss francs - and what the funds were used for.
A story published in the newsmagazine "Spiegel" last month claimed that he had made the payment in 2000 and that the funds were used to buy the votes of four Asian members of FIFA's Executive Committee, helping Germany win the right to host the 2006 tournament.
'No votes bought'
However, DFB President Niersbach has denied this, saying that the original payment from Louis-Dreyfus wasn't made until 2002, long after Germany had been awarded the World Cup. There were "no slush funds, no votes were bought," Niersbach said at a press conference late last month.
 
Watch video02:34

Niersbach: 'No votes were bought'

Instead, Niersbach said, the 10 million francs were used to unlock FIFA subsidies to help the committee organize the tournament.
The president of the 2006 World Cup organizing committee, Franz Beckenbauer, issued a statement last week in which he also said no votes were bought.
"In order to receive a financial subsidy from FIFA, it was agreed to accept a recommendation from FIFA's Finance Committee, which from today's perspective, should have been rejected," Beckenbauer said.
"As the president of the organizing committee, I take responsibility for this error," he added.
Beckenbauer said he had made these statements during questioning by investigators from an outside firm that is looking into allegations of wrongdoing at the DFB in connection with the bidding process.

AD BANNAR