Boxed Style

আইফোন জিতে ক্লিক করুন

Wednesday 9 November 2016

Russia's Putin congratulates Trump on election win


Russian President Vladimir Putin congratulated businessman Donald Trump on his victory in the US presidential election in a telegram on Wednesday, the Kremlin said.
"Putin expressed hope for joint work to restore Russian-American relations from their state of crisis, and also to address pressing international issues and search for effective responses to challenges concerning global security," the Kremlin said in a statement.
Putin also said he was sure a constructive dialogue between Moscow and Washington would serve the interests of both countries, the Kremlin said.

Trump triumphs over Clinton in White House upset


President
Trump Clinton
289 (√) 218
Senate
Republicans Democrats
 51 (√) 47
Republican Donald Trump stunned the world on Tuesday by defeating heavily favored Hillary Clinton in the race for the White House, ending eight years of Democratic rule and sending the United States on a new, uncertain path.
A wealthy real-estate developer and former reality TV host, Trump rode a wave of anger toward Washington insiders to defeat Clinton, whose gold-plated establishment resume includes stints as a first lady, US senator and secretary of state.

Worried a Trump victory could cause economic and global uncertainty, investors were in full flight from risky assets such as stocks. In overnight trading, S&P 500 index futures fell 5 percent to hit their so-called limit down levels, indicating they would not be permitted to trade any lower until regular US stock market hours on Wednesday.
The Associated Press and Fox News projected that Trump had collected just enough of the 270 state-by-state electoral votes needed to win a four-year term that starts on Jan. 20, taking battleground states where presidential elections are traditionally decided.
CNN reported Clinton had called Trump to concede the election.
A short time earlier, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told supporters at her election rally in New York to go home. "Several states are too close to call so we're not going to have anything more to say tonight," he said.
Victorious in a cliffhanger race that opinion polls had forecast was Clinton's to win, Trump won avid support among a core base of white non-college educated workers with his promise to be the "greatest jobs president that God ever created."
His win raises a host of questions for the United States at home and abroad. He campaigned on a pledge to take the country on a more isolationist, protectionist "America First" path. He has vowed to impose a 35 percent tariff on goods exported to the United States by US companies that went abroad.
Both candidates, albeit Trump more than Clinton, had historically low popularity ratings in an election that many voters characterized as a choice between two unpleasant alternatives.
Trump, who at 70 will be the oldest first-term US president, came out on top after a bitter and divisive campaign that focused largely on the character of the candidates and whether they could be trusted to serve as the country's 45th president.
The presidency will be his first elected office, and it remains to be seen how he will work with Congress. During the campaign Trump was the target of sharp disapproval, not just from Democrats but from many in his own party.
Television networks projected Republicans would retain control of the US House of Representatives, where all 435 seats were up for grabs. In the US Senate, the party also put up an unexpectedly tough fight to protect its majority in the US Senate.
Trump entered the race 17 months ago and survived a series of seemingly crippling blows, many of them self-inflicted, including the emergence in October of a 2005 video in which he boasted about making unwanted sexual advances on women. He apologized but within days, several women emerged to say he had groped them, allegations he denied. He was judged the loser of all three presidential debates with Clinton.

TOUTS HIS BUSINESS ACUMEN

During the campaign, Trump said he would make America great again through the force of his personality, negotiating skill and business acumen. He proposed refusing entry to the United States of people from war-torn Middle Eastern countries, a modified version of an earlier proposed ban on Muslims.
His volatile nature and unorthodox proposals led to campaign feuds with a long list of people, including Muslims, the disabled, Republican US Senator John McCain, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, the family of a slain Muslim-American soldier, a Miss Universe winner and a federal judge of Mexican heritage.
Throughout his campaign - and especially in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in July - Trump described a dark America that had been knocked to its knees by China, Mexico, Russia and Islamic State. The American dream was dead, he said, smothered by malevolent business interests and corrupt politicians, and he alone could revive it.
He offered vague plans to win economic concessions from China, to build a wall on the southern US border with Mexico to keep out undocumented immigrants and to pay for it with tax money sent home by migrants.
The Mexican peso plunged to its lowest-ever levels. The peso had become a touchstone for sentiment on the election as Trump threatened to rip up a free trade agreement with Mexico.
His triumph was a rebuke to President Barack Obama, a Democrat who spent weeks flying around the country to campaign against him. Obama will hand over the office to Trump after serving the maximum eight years allowed by law.
Trump promises to push Congress to repeal Obama's troubled healthcare plan and to reverse his Clean Power Plan. He plans to create jobs by relying on US fossil fuels such as oil and gas.

CLINTON'S FAILED SECOND BID

Trump's victory marked a frustrating end to the presidential aspirations of Clinton, 69, who for the second time failed in her drive to be elected the first woman US president.
In a posting on Twitter, Clinton acknowledged a battle that was unexpectedly tight given her edge in opinion polls going into Election Day.
"This team has so much to be proud of. Whatever happens tonight, thank you for everything," she tweeted.
The wife of former President Bill Clinton and herself a former US senator, she held a steady lead in many opinion polls for months. Voters perceived in her a cautious and calculating candidate and an inability to personally connect with them.
Even though the FBI found no grounds for criminal charges after a probe into her use of a private email server rather than a government system while she was secretary of state, the issue allowed critics to raise doubts about her integrity. Hacked emails also showed a cozy relationship between her State Department and donors to her family's Clinton Foundation charity.
Trump seized on the emails to charge that Clinton represented a corrupt political system in Washington that had to be swept clean.
Trump's national security ideas, opposed by most of the elite voices across the political spectrum, have simultaneously included promises to build up the US military while at the same time avoiding foreign military entanglements.
He wants to rewrite international trade deals to reduce trade deficits. He has taken positions that raise the possibility of damaging relations with America's most trusted allies in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
He has promised to warm relations with Russia that have chilled under Obama over Russian President Vladimir Putin's intervention in the Syrian civil war and his seizure of Ukraine's Crimea region.
"Wouldn't it be nice if we could get along with Russia?" he said at many rallies.

Analysis: He made a fool of the world


The bafflement and bewilderment among the saner heads are now widespread as the US election results show Trump has triumphed.  The feelings sloshing around us are understandable. How could a man so unfit to head a superpower, so unreliable, so sexually scandalous and so misogynic and racist could make such a comeback?
Paul Krugman, the Nobel winning economist and columnist, in his lament for the result writes in The New York Times, truly reflecting the emotions of a logical people, “What we do know is that people like me, and probably like most readers of The New York Times, truly didn’t understand the country we live in. It turns out that we were wrong.”
Yes we were wrong. Yes the whole world was wrong. The media were wrong. The politicians were wrong. The World leaders were wrong, and even Trump’s own party leaders were wrong.
How could we support a man who so openly boasts about groping women? How could we support a man who does not believe in inclusiveness and thinks Muslims should be thrown out of the  country?
In the end Donald Trump looked a forlorn candidate in the race. More than 160 of his party top guns had deserted him. Most of the newspapers including the Republican leaning ones had turned on him. All the polls indicated that his rival Hilary Clinton will win. Even when the voting started, the projection showed Clinton’s winning chance of 85 percent.
However much we all thought like that, however much we wanted him to be defeated, more people than us in the US had thought otherwise. And they rushed in droves to vote for Trump.
America must search its soul and find an answer to this upset politics.
But some answers we can probably guess. The American society has become highly racist. The ongoing phenomenon of white American policemen killing blacks on trivial grounds and the backlash of some stray blacks killing white policemen was just an indication.
The white Americans had taken on a hardened attitude towards the immigrants and Muslims. They started believing in blood and soil.
To them, the venom and hatred that Trump spits is what they actually wanted to say but could not because of the veneer of civility.  Trump had unhinged that latch to inner psyche and gurgled out the filth. The voters went mad with joy at the sudden ventilation of their pent up feelings.
And Trump alone knew what he was doing.  He is a genius in that sense. His campaign team, all  very qualified professionals in the realm of communication, psychology and politics, cringed at Trump’s constant stewing of hate speeches and almost resigned. Many of them left their desk to hit the bars in the evening to pass their time more meaningfully. Trump overrode his campaigners in delivering his speeches. His campaign team failed to stop him from tweeting unsavoury texts. He closely watched and edited his advertisement campaigns, often to the frustrations of his team. And he proved right. Only he could touch the nerves of his fellow citizens.
When the tapes about Trump’s behavior with women came out, everybody that it is just about the last nail on his coffin. Yet, they forgot to recall what happened when a more severe kind of sex scandal was revealed about Bill Clinton regarding his sexual conduct with Monica Lewinsky. Clinton was reelected.
They forgot that such misogynistic attitude is so common in that society. Men and women actually take it for granted that men will behave like that with women.  Trump actually was the Man.
And he became more of a Man when the media deserted him. He was a lone fighter. A wounded bull that everybody wanted to win against the matador. And so he won.
A man who is considered as capable of bringing, if he wins, “a new age of darkness”, as The Guardian wrote, and the man whose win will put the world in danger as the UN Human Rights Commission observed and the highly reputable monthly, The Atlantic, which perceived him “to be a danger to the USA, had his last laugh.
Whether the world can smile too, we have to wait with crossed fingers to see.

8,523 pass in 37th BCS preliminary test

Public Service Commission (PSC) today published the results of the 37th Bangladesh Civil Service (BCS) preliminary test with 8,523 candidates coming out successful.
The results are available at www.bpsc.gov.bd.
The two-hour long preliminary test was held at 190 centres simultaneously in Dhaka, Chittagong, Rajshahi, Barisal, Khulna, Sylhet and Rangpur centres from 9:30am to 11:30am on September 30.
A total of 2, 43,476 candidates took part in the exam.

Republicans ‘keep control of Congress’


Both chambers of the US Congress are projected to remain under Republican control when they convene on January 3, with voters on Tuesday dashing Democrats' hopes of taking over the Senate while keeping the House of Representatives in Republican hands.
A few Senate races were still undecided, but projections by major media organizations indicated that Democrats no longer had a probable path toward capturing control of the 100-seat Senate.
So far, Democrats had succeeded in gaining only one seat from Republicans, in Illinois, where U.S. Representative Tammy Duckworth defeated Senator Mark Kirk. Democrats needed to pick up a net five seats to take Senate control.
Republicans campaigned on an agenda that shunned comprehensive immigration reform and opposed the national healthcare program known as Obamacare, gun control and expanded environmental and financial regulations.
The Republican Congress could be dealing in January with a Republican president. Donald Trump was edging closer to winning the White House over Democrat Hillary Clinton with a series of shocking wins on Tuesday in key states such as Florida and Ohio.
In the Senate, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, was expected to remain at his post for at least the next two years.
On the House side, Speaker Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, could face a divided party and a contentious battle in his re-election bid in January for the leadership job.

Donald Trump beats Hillary Clinton to win US presidency

Billionaire businessman beats former secretary of state, who calls to congratulate him on his victory.

Donald Trump is the next president of the United States after a long, bitter and divisive election campaign.
Projections early on Wednesday showed that Trump clinched victory over Hillary Clinton to become the 45th US president-elect after securing the 270 electoral votes needed to win.
Speaking to his supporters in New York after clinching victory, Trump said that Clinton had congratulated him on his win.
US election: How did Hillary Clinton lose?
"I have just received a call from Secretary Clinton. She congratulated us on our victory … and I congratulated her and her family on a very very hard-fought campaign."
Trump said it was "time for us to come together", pledging to be president "for all Americans".
Clinton's campaign team said the Democratic candidate would speak on Wednesday morning.
Al Jazeera's James Bays, reporting from New York, described the result as "a political bombshell that we haven't seen in modern history".
The 2016 US election caught the attention of hundreds of millions around the world with dramatic moments in the campaign grabbing headlines for more than a year.
Trump was seen as the least likely candidate to win in what was an extremely a tight race.
A former reality TV star, Trump announced his candidacy in June 2015.
Since then, the billionaire businessman from New York has consistently alienated minority groups, refused to release his tax returns and remained seemingly unapologetic for leaked tapes in which he brags about sexually assaulting women.
Global markets fell as the projected results emerged amid fears that a Trump presidency could cause financial turmoil.
The dollar lost value against other currencies, and the Mexican peso saw its steepest dive in more than 20 years, plummeting 8 percent at one point. Oil futures also declined.
Clinton had a slim lead in the polls but no one was ruling out a Trump victory. A polling average by tracker site RealClearPolitics gave Clinton a 3.3-percentage point national lead.
The 69-year-old former first lady, senator, and secretary of state - who was backed by incumbent President Barack Obama - on Monday urged the country to unite and vote for "a hopeful, inclusive, big-hearted America" in her last effort to woo voters.
Trump, meanwhile, pressed his message with voters who feel left behind by globalisation and social change, wrapping up with a flourish on his protectionist slogan of "America first".
Promising to end "years of betrayal," tear up free trade deals, seal the border, halt the drug trade and subject Syrian refugees to "extreme vetting", Trump told his supporters in New Hampshire: "I am with you and I will fight for you and we will win."
Clinton had pushed a more optimistic vision, despite a wobble in the final weeks of her campaign when the FBI re-opened an investigation into whether she had put US secrets at risk by using a private email server - only to close the probe again on Sunday. The email investigation allowed Trump to recover ground lost in a series of recent scandals.
Source: Al Jazeera News

PM congratulates Trump, invites him to Bangladesh



Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina today congratulated Donald Trump on the latter’s victory in the race for White House and emerging as the new US president.
In a letter hours after the victory of the new president, Hasina hoped of boosting ties with US under his leadership and invited Trump and his wife to visit Bangladesh.
“I am confident that under your leadership, the existing bilateral relation between our two friendly nations would be further strengthened,” she said in the letter.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina“I look forward to working closely with you for advancing our bilateral and multilateral interests and contributing to create a safe and secured world, where our coming generations could live and continue to prosper peacefully.”
“I cordially invite you and Mrs Melania Trump to visit Bangladesh at a mutually convenient time and see for yourself the phenomenal development that took place in Bangladesh in the recent years.”


Tuesday 4 October 2016

Bangladesh will stay beside India if attacked: Kamal

Star Online Report
Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal today said Bangladesh will stay beside India if the neighbouring country is attacked following the ongoing tension with Pakistan.

The home minister made the comment while replying to a query about Bangladesh’s stance on the current unrest situation between India and Pakistan following the recent Uri attack and India's retaliatory surgical strikes on terror launch pads across the LoC.

Meanwhile, Pakistan and India have agreed to reduce tensions after their National Security Advisors spoke over phone, top Pakistani diplomat Sartaj Aziz said yesterday.

On Tahmid

The home minister said law enforcers did not pray for fresh remand for Tahmid Hasib Khan, one of the Gulshan café attack survivors, as they did not get enough information in previous remands.

“We will be able to question him further if we need it,” Kamal added.

On Sunday, the court granted bail to Tahmid, who was released at the same night.

It was widely reported earlier that Tahmid, a Canadian university student, and Hasnat Karim, a former private university teacher in Bangladesh, were taken in by detectives for interrogation immediately after the 11-hour bloody siege ended on July 2.

Hacking of Sylhet college student

The home minister firmly stated that the attacker, who stabbed Sylhet Government Mohila College student Khadija Akter Nargis yesterday, will be brought to justice, no matter what his political association is.

On Monday evening, Khadija, 23, a student of the college and daughter of Masuk Miah, a resident of Hausa village in Sadar upazila, was stopped on her way to home from college allegedly by Badrul Alam, 30, assistant secretary of BCL unit at Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST).

Hearing screams of the victim, locals rescued Khadija and caught Badrul from the spot and handed him over to police after giving him a good thrashing.
On border killings by BSF
The government logged protests with Indian authorities every time a Bangladeshi citizen is killed by their Border Security Force (BSF), Kamal said adding both the countries are working to reduce such incidents.

Nobel physics prize awarded to 3 British scientists for topology work

AP, Stockholm
British-born scientists David Thouless, Duncan Haldane and Michael Kosterlitz were awarded this year's Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday for work that "revealed the secrets of exotic matter," the prize committee said.
The three "opened the door" to an unknown world where matter takes unusual states or phases, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.
They were for their "theoretical discoveries of topological phase transitions and topological phases of matter."
Thouless, 82, is a professor emeritus at the University of Washington. Haldane, 65, is a physics professor at Princeton University in New Jersey. Kosterlitz, 73, is a physics professor at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island.
Their research was conducted in the 1970s and '80s. Nobel judges often award discoveries made decades ago, to make sure they withstand the test of time.
This year's Nobel Prize announcements started Monday with the medicine award going to Japanese biologist Yoshinori Ohsumi for discoveries on autophagy, the process by which a cell breaks down and recycles content.
The chemistry prize will be announced on Wednesday and the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday. The economics and literature awards will be announced next week.
Each prize has a purse of 8 million kronor ($930,000). The winners also collect a medal and a diploma at the award ceremonies on December 10, the anniversary of prize founder Alfred Nobel's death in 1896.

Over 6,000 migrants plucked from sea in a single day, 22 dead

Reuters
About 6,055 migrants were rescued and 22 found dead on the perilous sea route to Europe on Monday, one of the highest numbers in a single day, Italian and Libyan officials said.
Italy's coastguard said at least nine migrants had died and a pregnant woman and a child had been taken by helicopter to a hospital on the Italian island of Lampedusa, halfway between Sicily and the Libyan coast.
Libyan officials said 11 migrant bodies had washed up on a beach east of the capital, Tripoli, and another two migrants had died when a boat sank off the western city of Sabratha.
One Italian coast guard ship rescued about 725 migrants on a single rubber boat, one of some 20 rescue operations during the day.
About 10 ships from the coast guard, the navy and humanitarian organisations were involved in the rescues, most of which took place some 30 miles off the coast of Libya.
Libyan naval and coastguard patrols intercepted three separate boats carrying more than 450 migrants, officials said.
Monday was the third anniversary of the sinking of a migrant boat off the Italian island of Lampedusa in which 386 people died.
According to the International Organisation for Migration, around 132,000 migrants have arrived in Italy since the start of the year and 3,054 have died.
Most depart from Libya, where political chaos and a security vacuum have allowed people smugglers to act with impunity.

Attack on Sylhet college girl: SUST suspends Badrul

Star Online Report
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST) today suspended Badrul Alam, who brutally hacked Khadija Akter Nargis, a student of Sylhet Government Women’s College yesterday.
Badrul, a fourth-year student of Economic Department and an assistant secretary of SUST unit Chhatra League, waylaid Khadija and hacked on her way to home from college.
Khadija Akter Nargis is undergoing treatment at neurosurgical intensive care unit at Square Hospital of Dhaka.
The academic council of the university took the decision at an emergency meeting this afternoon, SUST Proctor Rashed Talukdar told Sylhet correspondent.
The university also formed a three-member committee to investigate the incident.
Meanwhile, Bangladesh Chhatra League has dined any political link with Badrul.
“Chhatra League unit of Shahjalal University has no relation with Badrul at present,” said a press release signed by Delwar Hossain Shahjada, office secretary of BCL.

Sharapova can play again in April after ban reduced

Reuters, Geneva
Maria Sharapova today said she could not wait to return to tennis next April after the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) reduced the former world number one's two-year drugs ban by nine months.
Hailing one of the happiest days of her career, the Russian said she had learned a lesson from the "tough months" behind her and hoped the International Tennis Federation (ITF) and anti-doping authorities had also.
"In so many ways, I feel like something I love was taken away from me and it will feel really good to have it back," the 29-year-old five-times grand slam champion said in a message to fans on her facebook page.
"Tennis is my passion and I have missed it. I am counting the days until I can return to the court."
Sharapova was handed the original ban, backdated to start on Jan. 26, 2016, by the ITF following her positive test for the drug meldonium.
The arbitration panel ruled on Tuesday that she had committed an anti-doping rule violation for which "she bore some degree of fault".
It added that the decision to reduce the ban concerned solely "the degree of fault that can be imputed to the player for her failure to make sure that the substance contained in a product that she had been taking over a long period remained in compliance with the anti-doping rules."
Sharapova had called the ITF's original ruling "unfairly harsh" as an independent tribunal had found that she had not intentionally violated anti-doping rules.
She admitted taking meldonium during the season's opening grand slam in Melbourne but said she had been unaware that it had been banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).
Meldonium was added to WADA's list of banned substances at the start of the year after mounting evidence that it boosted blood flow and enhanced athletic performance.
"I have learned from this, and I hope the ITF has as well," said Sharapova, adding that she had always taken responsibility for not knowing the over-the-counter supplement she had taken for 10 years was no longer allowed.
The player said other federations had been much better at notifying their athletes of the rule change, especially in Eastern Europe where meldonium, or mildronate, was taken by millions of people.
"Now that this process is over, I hope the ITF and other relevant tennis anti-doping authorities will study what these other Federations did, so that no other tennis player will have to go through what I went through," she added.
Shamil Tarpishev, president of the Russian tennis federation, welcomed the reduced ban.
"It's good, they reduced the ban", he told Russia's TASS news agency. "We want her to play for the national team and win the next Olympics for us."
Sponsor Head said justice had been served.
"We eagerly await her return to competitive tennis in April 2017 and we are very proud to have stood by Maria for the right reasons throughout these difficult and testing times," CEO Johan Eliasch said in a statement.

Hacked student of Sylhet college in critical state

Star Online Report
--Victim in a critical state
--Case filed against attacker Badrul
--Attacker to be brought to justice: Home minister
-- Protest pouring
The Sylhet Government Women’s College student, who was waylaid and hacked brutally under broad daylight by a Chhatra League leader yesterday, is now in a “critical state”.
Khadija Akter Nargis is undergoing treatment at neurosurgical intensive care unit at Square Hospital of Dhaka.
“Several injury marks were found in the victim’s head, skull and brain. She is in a critical condition,” Mirza Nazimuddin, director of the hospital, told reporters.
She also sustained severe stab injuries in her hands, he added.
Khadija was waylaid and hacked on her way to home from college by Badrul Alam, 30, who is assistant secretary of the ruling party’s student front unit at Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST).
The injured was initially admitted in Sylhet Osmani Medical College where she had undergone the first surgery. Later she was transferred to Square Hospital last night.
Hearing screams of the victim, locals rescued Khadija and caught Badrul from the spot and handed him over to police after giving him a good thrashing.

Case filed over stabbing

A case was filed with Shah Paran Police Station showing Badrul as lone accused, said Zedan Al Musa, additional deputy commissioner of police in Sylhet.
Victim’s uncle Abdul Quddus filed the case around 2:30pm, the police official told our local correspondent.
“We will interrogate him (Badrul) and produce him before a court soon,” he said.

Home minister’s remark

Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal firmly stated that the attacker will be brought to justice, no matter what his political association is.
The minister made the comment while talking to reporters at the secretariat.

Protest pouring

Meanwhile, several hundred students of the college today blockaded the Sylhet-Tamabil highway demanding exemplary punishment of the attacker.
The agitating students thronged the highway at Tilaghar area around 10:00am, halting traffic movement on the highway for around four hours.
They withdrew their protest around 2:00pm following an assurance from the police authorities to meet their demand.

How to get smart NID card?

The newly introduced smart national identity (NID) card will put an end to forgery as it has 25 security features.
The machine-readable card will have 32 types of basic information of a citizen embedded in its microchip, said Election Commission officials.
Currently, NID cards are required for availing at least 22 types of services, including passport, banking, driving licence, trade licence and share trading. In future, it would be required for getting many more services.
EC Secretary Sirazul Islam said, “Many perpetrators of crimes forged the existing NID cards and we could not prevent it. But forging the smart NID cards would be almost impossible.”
Anyone will be able to verify some basic information of a smart card by using the cardholder's fingerprint through a desktop or laptop computer after installing software which would soon be available via www.nidw.gov.bd.
Some jubilant voters showing their smart national ID cards outside the camp. Distribution of the cards with biometric details began yesterday. Photo: Prabir Das and Amran Hossain
The smart NID cards were produced in France and later data were stored in the cards in Bangladesh, said Brig Gen Sultanuzzaman Md Saleh Uddin, director general at the EC's NID Registration Wing. 
According to EC officials, the smart cards would first be distributed to citizens in the capital, followed by in city corporations, district headquarters and upazilas.
For getting a smart NID card, a citizen will have to appear in person at an EC-designated distribution centre.
The EC officials would collect the citizen's biometric details, impressions from 10 fingers and a photo of iris which would be embedded in the card's microchip.
After completion of the procedure, the officials would hand over the smart card to the citizen, but only after taking back his/her exiting NID card.
The schedules and names of card distribution centres will be announced through newspaper advertisements and community-based campaigns, like announcements in mosques.
Besides, anyone can get information about the schedule and distribution centres by logging on to www.nidw.gov.bd or calling at 105 or sending an SMS to 105 from any mobile phone.
For sending an SMS to 105, one has to go to the message option of his phone, type “SC”, leave a space, type “NID”, again leave a space and type the 17-digit NID card number.
Those who have 13-digit number will have to add their year of birth before the number to make it a 17-digit one.
Voters, who are yet to have an NID card, will have to go to the distribution centres with their voter registration slip.
Those who have lost their existing cards will have to contact their respective upazila or thana election offices with the main copy of a general diary which was filed with the police station concerned.
Although it costs the EC around $1.6 to produce a smart NID card, it would be delivered to citizens free of cost. Initially, the cards will be valid for 10 years, said Saleh Uddin.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina inaugurated the distribution of smart NID cards in the capital on Sunday. Chief Election Commissioner Kazi Rakibuddin Ahmad started distribution of the cards in Kurigram yesterday.
Cards were distributed in a village in Phulbari upazila of Kurigram and two wards in the capital -- one under Ramna Police Station and another under Uttara Police Station.
Currently, there are over 10 crore voters in Bangladesh. Of them, nine crore will get smart cards by the next year under an ongoing project. The rest of the voters would get cards under a new project which would be launched soon.
EC officials said citizens' data are safe from unauthorised access as the database servers are “fully protected”.

Tuesday 27 September 2016

Clinton wins first debate: CNN/ORC poll

Star Online Report
Hillary Clinton was deemed the winner of Monday night's debate by 62% of voters who tuned in to watch, while just 27% said they thought Donald Trump had the better night, according to a CNN/ORC Poll of voters who watched the debate.
That drubbing is similar to Mitt Romney's dominant performance over President Barack Obama in the first 2012 presidential debate, CNN reports.

READ more: Clinton, Trump clash in fiery first debate
Voters who watched said Clinton expressed her views more clearly than Trump and had a better understanding of the issues by a margin of more than 2-to-1. Clinton also was seen as having done a better job addressing concerns voters might have about her potential presidency by a 57% to 35% margin, and as the stronger leader by a 56% to 39% margin.
The gap was smaller on which candidate appeared more sincere and authentic, though still broke in Clinton's favor, with 53% saying she was more sincere vs. 40% who felt Trump did better on that score. Trump topped Clinton 56% to 33% as the debater who spent more time attacking their opponent.
Although the survey suggested debate watchers were more apt to describe themselves as Democrats than the overall pool of voters, even independents who watched deemed Clinton the winner, 54% vs. 33% who thought Trump did the best job in the debate.
And the survey suggests Clinton outperformed the expectations of those who watched. While pre-debate interviews indicated these watchers expected Clinton to win by a 26-point margin, that grew to 35 points in the post-debate survey.
About half in the poll say the debate did not have an effect on their voting plans, 47% said it didn't make a difference, but those who say they were moved by it tilted in Clinton's direction, 34% said the debate made them more apt to vote for Clinton, 18% more likely to back Trump.
On the issues, voters who watched broadly say Clinton would do a better job handling foreign policy, 62% to 35%, and most think she would be the better candidate to handle terrorism, 54% to 43% who prefer Trump. But on the economy, the split is much closer, with 51% saying they favor Clinton's approach vs. 47% who prefer Trump.
Most debate watchers came away from Monday's face-off with doubts about Trump's ability to handle the presidency. Overall, 55% say they didn't think Trump would be able to handle the job of president, 43% said they thought he would. Among political independents who watched the debate, it's a near-even split, 50% say he can handle it, 49% that he can't.
And voters who watched were more apt to see Trump's attacks on Clinton as unfair than they were to see her critiques that way. About two-thirds of debate viewers, 67%, said Clinton's critiques of Trump were fair, while just 51% said the same of Trump.
Assessments of Trump's attacks on Clinton were sharply split by gender, with 58% of men seeing them as fair compared with 44% of women who watched on Monday. There was almost no gender divide in perceptions of whether Clinton's attacks were fair.
The CNN/ORC post-debate poll includes interviews with 521 registered voters who watched the September 26 debate. Results among debate-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. Respondents were originally interviewed as part of a September 23-25 telephone survey of a random sample of Americans, and indicated they planned to watch the debate and would be willing to be re-interviewed when it was over.https://youtu.be/ZEHPrYUcoi0

Trump hits Clinton on stamina; she pounces in retort

AP, Washington
It was the opening Hillary Clinton had been waiting for all night.
Late in Monday's debate, when the candidates each had notched their points on trade, taxes, crime and more, the talk turned to Clinton's stamina, brought to the fore by her recent bout of pneumonia.

Also READ: Clinton wins first debate - CNN/ORC poll Moderator Lester Holt of NBC asked Trump what he had meant by questioning whether Clinton had a "presidential look."
Trump didn't back off: "She doesn't have the look," he reaffirmed. "She doesn't have the stamina."
"You have so many different things you have to be able to do and I don't believe Hillary has the stamina."
He made his point, feeding into the conspiracy theories swirling about Clinton's health, as well as feeding into sexist questions about whether a woman is tough enough for the job.
Clinton stood stock still, waiting to pounce.
First, she let fly a recitation of her exploits as secretary of state: travels to 112 countries, negotiations on peace deals, cease-fires and imprisoned dissidents - even the 11 hours she spent testifying before a congressional committee investigating the Benghazi situation.
Once Trump can do all that, said Clinton, "He can talk to me about stamina."
Then, she quickly pivoted to the point she'd been dying to make all night, hoping to turn every woman in America against him and evoking memories of Trump's boorish behavior in the primary election season.
Trump, she said, had tried to switch the context of his remarks from talking about her "looks" to her "stamina."
"But this is a man who called women pigs, slobs and dogs," she continued.
She went on to reference his past remarks calling pregnancy an "inconvenience" for employers and questioning when women should get equal pay.
Then, she went to Exhibit A, bringing up a onetime beauty queen whom Trump had called "Miss Piggy" and "Miss Housekeeping, because she was Latina."
That woman, Clinton said, is now an American citizen - "and you can bet she's going to vote this November."
Trump was left to ask: "Where did you find this? Where did you find this? Oh really?"
He didn't deny he'd said it.
Instead, he played the victim, and offered himself as a model of restraint.
"I was going to say something extremely rough to Hillary, to her family. And I said to myself, I can't do it, I just can't do it," he said.
Clinton, he said, had spent hundreds of millions of dollars on negative ads on him, and "it's not nice. And I don't deserve that."
Later, during post-debate press interviews, Trump disclosed what he had held back:
"I was very happy I was able to hold back on the indiscretions of Bill Clinton."
There were plenty of tit-for-tat moments between Trump and Clinton over the 90-minute debate.
In this one, Trump made his point. But Clinton managed to revive a whole body of questions about how the Republican nominee treats half the electorate.

‘Tangail boy jailed for possessing narcotics,’ HC told

Star Online Report
Authorities today told the High Court that the Tangail schoolboy – who was handed two-year-jail for alleged Facebook threat to a lawmaker – was handed penalised “for narcotics”.
- After jailing boy in ICT act, they now say it was for narcotics
- ‘Assaulted, tortured, threatened’ for ‘threatening’ MP
- Authorities appear before High Court for explanation
Tangail authorities provided the turnaround explanation in response to High Court’s summon – based on a report published in The Daily Star on September 20.
The report quoted Executive Magistrate Rafiqul Islam to say that the boy penalised under ICT Act after the class IX student admitted sending a Facebook text to local lawmaker Anupam Shajahan Joy.
Now, the High Court has set October 18 for passing further order on its suo moto rule – issued earlier seeking explanation from Sakhipur UNO and local OC on their actions.
The boy, Sabbir Shikder, a student of Protima Bonki Public High School in Sakhipur upazila and now on bail, was also present before the High Court and presented his account today.

‘WAS ASSAULTED, THREATENED WITH DEATH’

Describing his account of the incident, Sabbir said plainclothes picked him up from his house around 9:00pm on September 16 and took him blindfolded to Sakhipur Police Station.
There, Sakhipur Officer-in-Charge Maksudul Islam “tortured him and threatened to kill him in crossfire” before escorting him to the residence of MP Anupam Shahjahan.
“The lawmaker beat me up with stick,” Sabbir said. Then he was taken to the office of Sakhipur upazila nirbahi officer (UNO) Rafiqul Islam, where the upazila officer kicked him before jailing him for two years.
However, UNO’s lawyer SM Rezaul Karim and OC’s lawyer Nurul Islam Sujon told the High Court that the mobile court sentenced Sabbir for carrying marijuana.
Also, on the note of the report, the lawyers said that The Daily Star published it to malign the image of the lawmaker.

Diversity Award means so much to India: Barse

AFP . Manchester
Award‘Slum Soccer’ winning the inaugural FIFA Diversity award will mean the world to India, better known for its cricket than football, the CEO Abhijeet Barse told AFP on Monday.
‘Slum Soccer’ saw off two other short-listed rivals—The International Gay and Lesbian Football Association (ILGBTFA) and British anti-discrimination pressure group ‘Kick It Out’—to take the award.
“This is absolutely thrilling for India, being acknowledged for a football project when India doesn’t ever make the football headlines!” an overjoyed Barse said at the Soccerex Global Football Convention.
“This will help us project ourselves onto the Government with this sort of publicity.
“The Government used to see it as education versus sport but now they see sport is part of education.”
‘Slum Soccer’ Barse explained takes in children who are outcasts in society and gets them playing football as a means to getting their confidence back with the ultimate goal of re-integrating them into society.
“They just give up because they have no direction and don’t feel part of the community,” he said.
“We go not only into the slums but also to schools and we take children who feel marginalised.
“At the moment we have around 12,000 on a daily basis in the project not just in the cities but also in the villages and rural areas.”
Barse, who is an academic by background, said that it had been wonderful to see some of the successes they had had in their different children.
“Many have gone on to gain the confidence to apply for and obtain jobs,” he said.
“Some have even returned to our project as coaches. Others have returned to resume their education and are absorbed back into the community that once they didn’t feel part of.
“That is because we have built up their confidence through playing together and being a unit, learning off each other as much as from us adults.”
Barse, whose project is backed by among others UNICEF and FIFA’s Football For Hope, said that his father had been the brainchild behind the project.
“He was a sportsman himself, a handball player,” said Barse.
“But he came from a very poor background and he knew that lots of children wouldn’t be getting opportunities to shine because of their origins.
“Thus 14 years ago he started up ‘Slum Soccer’ to give them a possibility of hope. And it grew and grew.”
However, success as often the case had its price as Barse Senior discovered and his son observed.
“He realised it was unmanageable and I saw the impact it was having on him,” said Barse.
“I was doing my PhD in the US at the time but I decided that I would return and help,” he said.
“I have no regrets because of the joy it brings. Of course there are challenges but different to the ones I found in academia.
“It is very satisfying.”

Colombia, FARC rebels sign historic peace deal

AFP . Cartagena | Update:
ColombiaColombia’s leftist FARC rebel force signed a historic peace accord with the government Monday and apologized to the countless victims of the country’s half-century civil war.
In an emotional open-air ceremony, President Juan Manuel Santos welcomed the communist rebels into the political sphere after signing the accord with FARC leader Rodrigo Londono, alias Timoleon “Timochenko” Jimenez.
Dressed in white, the former mortal enemies signed and shook hands, smiling before an audience of international dignitaries, drawing loud cheers.
The ceremony in the Caribbean coast city of Cartagena followed a four-year process to end the last major armed conflict in the Americas. The accord remains to be ratified by referendum in a week.
“We are being reborn to launch a new era of reconciliation and of building peace,” Timochenko said.
“In the name of the FARC, I sincerely apologize to all the victims of the conflict for any pain we may have caused during this war.”
Colombian authorities estimate the territorial and ideological conflict has killed 260,000 people, left 45,000 missing and uprooted 6.9 million.
“Let no one doubt that we are moving towards politics without weapons. Let us all prepare to disarm hearts and minds,” Timochenko said.
Santos then stepped up to the podium and addressed a message to the thousands of FARC fighters preparing to disarm in their jungle camps.
“When you begin your return to society... as head of state of the homeland that we all love, I welcome you to democracy,” he said.
“Swapping bullets for votes and weapons for ideas is the bravest and most intelligent decision that any rebel group could take.”
The 2,500 guests at the signing included UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, US Secretary of State John Kerry and the Vatican’s Secretary of State Pietro Parolin.
An array of Latin American heads of state, including Cuban President Raul Castro, sat near the signatories on stage.
FARC’s political future
The FARC launched its guerrilla war on the Colombian government in 1964, after a peasant uprising that was crushed by the army.
Over the decades, the conflict drew in several leftist rebel groups, right-wing paramilitaries and drug gangs.
Under the deal, the FARC is now to relaunch as a political party. Timochenko, 57, is expected to remain its leader.
At a remote jungle camp in El Diamante, western Colombia, FARC fighter David Preciado celebrated the accord by playing football with his comrades.
“The government did not defeat us, and we did not defeat them. Our 52 years of war were not in vain,” he told AFP.
“We are aware that we have to move forward together, united... to finally achieve victory, giving power to the people by political means.”
Amnesty
The rebels came to the negotiating table after being weakened by an army offensive led by Santos, 65, when he was defense minister.
After he became president, four years of talks hosted by Cuba yielded a final, 300-page accord last month.
It grants an amnesty for “political crimes” committed during the conflict, but not for the worst atrocities, such as massacres, torture and rape.
The FARC’s fighters are to leave their mountain and jungle hideouts and disarm in a UN-supervised process.
Colombian authorities estimate their number at more than 7,000.
No to ‘terrorists’
Recent polls show the “Yes” camp in the lead to ratify the accord in the referendum on October 2.
Some Colombians resent the concessions made to the FARC, however.
Former president Alvaro Uribe led a demonstration in protest at the signing on Monday.
“The Americans would not grant impunity to Osama Bin Laden. The French would not grant impunity to (Islamist militants) ISIS,” he said.
“Why should we Colombians grant total impunity to terrorists?”
Santos told the gathering at the signing ceremony: “I prefer an imperfect accord that saves lives to a perfect war that keeps sowing death and pain.”
FARC off blacklist
The European Union suspended the FARC from its list of terrorist groups, EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said in a statement.
The government has yet to begin planned peace talks with another, smaller leftist rebel group, the National Liberation Army (ELN), saying it must first stop kidnappings.

The election process and the next election commission

M Sakhawat Hossain 

Prothom Alo carried an article on 17 September by Sohrab Hossain, asking ‘Who will conduct the elections?’ This was quite a timely piece and it is prime time to discuss the issue.
Hopefully the new election commission will be formed within less than four months, though there is no constitutional obligation to do so. There is no reason to believe that there will be any change in the process followed by the political governments in forming the election commission. The law minister has already said that the election commission will be appointed in the same manner as it has been in the past.
The election commission is formed in different ways in different countries. In some countries it hardly has a role to play in conducting the election. And in many democratic countries, it has control over the government during the election period. India is an example.
The election commission in India is firmly rooted and has strong support from the judiciary, the media, civil society and, above all, the political parties. They are all stakeholders. Very few election commissions in India have faced criticism.
During the last Lok Sabha election in India, the new Indian army chief was supposed to be elected, but even that was postponed at the behest of the commission.
Article 119 of our constitution also provides such powers to the election commission, but our commission cannot fully exercise these powers. They are not backed up by those supposed to back them. The judiciary must come forward to support the commission. When we were in the election commission, the media played a powerful role. We did not, however, receive as much support from the judiciary as desired.
I don’t know if the court can take any action automatically if the constitution is violated. In such cases, Indian civil society organisations approach the court through the PLI. In our country a few organisations did go to the court, but it is doubtful if they will be able to do so in the future.
Our experience with elections is not negligible. Our election commissions have dealt will all the types of elections as enumerated in political science. In our country, during one term an election commission gains experience of about 6000 election units, including the union parishad election and so on. India does not have this experience as the election commission there only conducts the Rajya Sabha election. The local elections are conducted by the respective state election commissions.
Despite our experience, there is a lack of continuity in our election work procedures. Actually the fault lies in the formation of the election commission. The commissions formed by the political governments simply look towards the government. So it then depends on the government, not the election commission, as to whether the election will be free, fair and credible.
The election commissions under the caretaker governments managed to conduct free, fair and credible elections, but after that the commissions failed to follow suit. The successive governments were non-cooperative and the election commissions were compromised.
The time span between 2007 and 2012 was significant in the history of the election commission. The elections conducted in this period were hardly debated and the election commission performed quite independently despite several bottlenecks and also managed to bring about several changes. Unfortunately, the subsequent commissions failed to carry on this trend or to effectively apply these changes.
There is a lack of public confidence in the present election system. It will be the first and foremost task of the next election commission to restore this confidence.
The first step will be the process of forming the election commission. Though there is similarity between the Indian constitution and ours, it must be kept in mind that the foundations of their democratic institutions, of which political parties are most important, are very strong. India’s federal structure is also conducive to democracy.
The fact of the matter remains that the election commission in Bangladesh cannot apply the authority vested upon it. The complementary bodies also fail to give it the required backing. Political parties, civil society, the government, the parliament, media, the judiciary and others are all important stakeholders in the election process and election management for a free, fair and credible election.
In rising democracies like Bangladesh, the lack of election integrity and acceptability on an international level is a problem for the administration. The United Nation’s 1948 Universal Declaration on Human Rights upholds an individual’s right to vote, and places importance on election integrity, credibility, international standards and settlement of election disputes.
The Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) in its research paper Deepening Democracy, and Professor Pippa Norris in her work, point out that if the election process is not credible and the application of law is absent, then the public becomes frustrated and loses confidence in the election process as well as in those who conduct the election.
Such elections are a serious violation of human rights. The governments which emerge from such elections, thus tend to be authoritarian and alienated from the people. The country’s entire election system is harmed. The price is paid in terms of law and order and human rights violations. This has been seen in post-election situations in Kenya, Nigeria and several East European countries.
If an election commission is biased or is ineffective, then the very foundations of democracy will be weak and authoritarianism will spring up. In our country, whether or not there will be a repeat of the 2014 elections and other subsequent polls, all depends on who will run the election commission and how they will perform their duty.
M Sakhawat Hossain: Retired Brigadier General, former election commissioner and columnist
hhintlbd@yahoo.com

Sofia Vergara wasted lots of money on accent lessons

IANS. Los Angeles
Sofia Vergara. Photo: AFPColombian-American actress Sofia Vergara spent a lot of money on speech lessons when she started out in the film industry.

The "Modern Family" actress says she wasted a ton of money trying to change her accent, reports femalefirst.co.uk.

"I spent so much money when I decided I was going to act. I'm like, 'I'm moving to Los Angeles, I'm gonna hire the best speech coach, I can't understand why Salma Hayek and Penelope Cruz can't learn how to speak perfectly, I'm gonna do it'," Vergara said on Harry Connick Jr's new TV show "Harry".

The 44-year-old says her son Manolo, now 24, grew increasingly frustrated with her as she kept pronouncing words wrong.

"He would run lines with me... And he'd say, 'Mum, I just corrected you, like, two seconds ago and you said the word again wrong'," she added.

Vergara, who is married to filmmaker Joe Manganiello, had earlier shared that she is glad to have had her son when she was young.

"I think it helps when he grows up and you are like friends, as well as mother and son. It's fantastic to have your kids young, because you have so much energy."

"I think my family's really funny. Colombian people need that because we come from times that were tough, and sometimes the only way to survive that was to make fun of ourselves and those situations," she had said.

Protest vote closes AFC congress in just 20 minutes

AFP . Panaji |
FIFAAn Asian football congress to elect representatives to the FIFA Council closed after just 20 minutes on Tuesday after members rejected the agenda in protest at a Qatari official being barred from the poll.
Members voted 42 to one against supporting the agenda at the meeting in India’s Goa, which meant the ballot to elect three new members to the world body’s powerful council was cancelled.
Asian Football Confederation (AFC) president Sheikh Salman bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa said it was “probably the shortest congress” he had ever chaired.
“It has been an eventful morning and the message is clear to us all. Now my final task is to declare the extraordinary congress closed,” said the Bahraini, before heading into an AFC executive committee committee.
Delegates said the agenda was rejected because a senior Qatari official had been banned from standing just 24 hours before the vote was due to take place.
Scandal-plagued FIFA’s ethics committee last month recommended a two-and-a-half-year ban for Saoud Al-Mohannadi, vice-president of the Qatar Football Association, for refusing to cooperate with a corruption investigation.
Mohannadi denies any wrongdoing and had initially been cleared to stand, before the AFC announced late on Sunday that he’d been ruled out by FIFA.
FIFA has not revealed the subject of the corruption inquiry, but it is not connected with allegations related to the 2022 World Cup, which Qatar will host.
Tuesday’s debacle was witnessed by FIFA president Gianni Infantino, who beat Sheikh Salman to the job in an election in February and who was in Goa for the congress.
“It was not the right way to go about things. I wish this process had been done much earlier,” Praful Patel, president of the All India Football Federation, told AFP.
“It’s only fair that elections take place in a way that is fair and just. When people file nominations I think at that stage it’s better if they know whether they are going to be able to contest or not,” he added.
Corruption scandals
Six candidates from Asia, including China and North Korea, had been due to vie for three seats on the FIFA Council, which was set up under anti-corruption reforms earlier this year.
FIFA’s all-powerful executive committee, which had become the epicentre of corruption at the organisation, was rebranded as the FIFA Council at the body’s congress in Mexico earlier this year.
It is meant to operate in a similar way to a company’s board of directors as part of plans to make FIFA more transparent, including in the awarding of World Cup hosting rights, following a string of corruption scandals.
Three male candidates—Zhang Jian of China, Iran’s Ali Kafashian Naeni and Zainudin Nordin of Singapore—were set to compete for two of the seats in Tuesday’s vote.
Former Australian footballer Moya Dodd was favourite to beat Mahfuza Ahkter of Bangladesh and North Korea’s Han Un-Gyong to be the AFC’s designated female representative.
FIFA boss Infantino is undertaking a clean-up of FIFA after a series of corruption scandals and bribery allegations plunged the body into crisis.
Former president Sepp Blatter is serving a six-year ban from football over ethics violations, while former secretary-general Jerome Valcke was banned for 10 years over misconduct regarding television deals and 2014 World Cup ticket sales.
Allegations of vote-buying have also dogged the awarding of the 2018 World Cup to Russia and the 2022 edition to Qatar.

Hillary wins 1st debate over Trump

en.prothom-alo Online Desk
DebateHillary Clinton was deemed the winner of Monday night's debate by 62 percent of voters who tuned in to watch, while just 27 percent said they thought Donald Trump had the better night, according to a CNN/ORC Poll of voters who watched the debate.
That drubbing is similar to Mitt Romney's dominant performance over President Barack Obama in the first 2012 presidential debate, CNN said in its report.
Voters who watched said Clinton expressed her views more clearly than Trump and had a better understanding of the issues by a margin of more than 2-to-1. Clinton also was seen as having done a better job addressing concerns voters might have about her potential presidency by a 57 percent to 35 percent margin, and as the stronger leader by a 56 percent to 39 percent margin.
CNN finds The gap was smaller on which candidate appeared more sincere and authentic, though still broke in Clinton's favor, with 53 percent saying she was more sincere vs. 40 percent who felt Trump did better on that score. Trump topped Clinton 56 percent to 33 percent as the debater who spent more time attacking their opponent.
Although the survey suggested debate watchers were more apt to describe themselves as Democrats than the overall pool of voters, even independents who watched deemed Clinton the winner, 54 percent vs. 33 percent who thought Trump did the best job in the debate.
And the survey suggests Clinton outperformed the expectations of those who watched. While pre-debate interviews indicated, these watchers expected Clinton to win by a 26-point margin that grew to 35 points in the post-debate survey, CNN said.
About half in the poll say the debate did not have an effect on their voting plans, 47 percent said it didn't make a difference, but those who say they were moved by it tilted in Clinton's direction, 34 percent said the debate made them more apt to vote for Clinton, 18 percent more likely to back Trump.
On the issues, voters who watched broadly say Clinton would do a better job handling foreign policy, 62 percent to 35 percent, and most think she would be the better candidate to handle terrorism, 54 percent to 43 percent who prefer Trump. But on the economy, the split is much closer, with 51 percent saying they favor Clinton's approach vs. 47 percent who prefer Trump.
Most debate watchers came away from Monday's face-off with doubts about Trump's ability to handle the presidency. Overall, 55 percent say they didn't think Trump would be able to handle the job of president, 43 percent said they thought he would. Among political independents who watched the debate, it's a near-even split, 50 percent say he can handle it, 49 percent that he can't, the CNN report said.
And voters who watched were more apt to see Trump's attacks on Clinton as unfair as they were to see her critiques that way. About two-thirds of debate viewers, 67 percent, said Clinton's critiques of Trump were fair, while just 51 percent said the same of Trump.
Assessments of Trump's attacks on Clinton were sharply split by gender, with 58 percent of men seeing them as fair compared with 44 percent of women who watched on Monday. There was almost no gender divide in perceptions of whether Clinton's attacks were fair.
The CNN/ORC post-debate poll includes interviews with 521 registered voters who watched the September 26 debate. Results among debate-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. Respondents were originally interviewed as part of a September 23-25 telephone survey of a random sample of Americans, and indicated they planned to watch the debate and would be willing to be re-interviewed when it was over.